IVT's Conference on Cloud and Virtualization (Dublin, 13-14th November 2012) was everything I'd hoped it would be. After two year of conference sessions simply peering into the Cloud to understand what it us, or sticking a head in to the Cloud to see what the risks are, it was good to spend two days looking through the Cloud to see how these risks can be managed and to review some case studies.
It served to endorse our opinion that while generalist Cloud providers are either not interested in the needs of the Life Sciences industry, or are still struggling to understand Life Sciences requirements, what some people have called the 'Pharma Cloud' (or 'Life Sciences' Cloud, and what we define as Compliant Cloud Computing) is here. As we report in one of our latest Perspectives opinion pieces, while specialist providers are relatively few, Infrastructure, Platform and Software as a Service can now be provisioned in a manner that meets the expectations of most regulators.
While it would have been good for an organization such as ISPE to provide such clarity, well done to IVT for organizing events in the US and Europe and giving people a chance to unpack such issues. To be fair to ISPE, many GAMP sessions have looked at Cloud at country specific meetings and conferences, but the topic really does need a couple of days to get your head around.
What also emerged was the ability to select the right Cloud model, including On-Premise options and discussions with a number of delegates confirmed the attractiveness of the Compliant Cloud Anywhere solution (IaaS, installed On-Premise, but owned and operated by a specialist Cloud Services provider).
At the end of the IVT event delegates (many of whom are from QA or IT Quality) went home with a much better understanding of what Cloud and Virtualization is and what the risks are. Perhaps more importantly, what also emerged were some good examples of how to mitigate the risks and the outline of a strategy to move further into the Cloud without risking regulatory compliance.
As we'll explore in our webcast "State of the Art in Compliant Cloud Computing", relatively few Life Sciences companies have a real Cloud Strategy that also addresses regulatory compliance and this is quickly becoming a necessity for organizations looking the take advantage of the business benefits that Cloud and Virtualization offers.
As clarity emerges we expect to see things move significantly further into the Cloud in the next 12 months - "watch this space" as they say!
Showing posts with label ISPE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISPE. Show all posts
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Friday, October 5, 2012
Reflecting on 21 years of GAMP
Last Tuesday saw the 21st anniversary celebrations of the GAMP Forum, now of course part of ISPE. It was a great opportunity to reflect on the history of GAMP and to catch up with some of the original founder members.
Although much of the talk was backward looking, rehashing events that led to the formation and subsequent growth of the GAMP forum, Randy Perez (current chairman of ISPE) did reflect upon the role that GAMP has played and continues to play within ISPE i.e. the GAMP Community of Practice has the best selling publications, the best attended conferences etc.
No one stopped at the time to really comment on why that might be. Having thought about it it occurs to me that this simply reflects the increasing importance of computerised systems not only in the pharmaceutical industry but also in everyday life. The pace of technology change is unending and it is perfectly understandable why GAMP came into being and why it continues to look into topical issues such as cloud computing, mobile platforms etc.
As long as this technology change continues apace GAMP will always have a role to play in applying well founded good practices to new technologies and new applications. There is however a significant challenge that ISPE/GAMP faces with the pace of technology change.
Looking back over recent years it appears that new technologies appear and are adopted by leading edge regulated companies faster than organisations such as ISPE/GAMP are currently able to respond. This is perfectly natural because the strength of organisation like ISPE and GAMP are that they are consensus driven and volunteer led. The time taken to achieve consensus and the limited time available from volunteers means that it takes months or years to discuss new technologies, the understand the implications, identify risks and how they can be mitigated and then to publish consensual good practice.
However, we're all aware that other technologies such as blogging, websites and social networking allow interaction between industry professionals in much shorter timescales. In many cases we are starting to see individuals and commercial organisations provide pragmatic and acceptable guidance well ahead of organisations such as GAMP/ISPE. The other part of the challenge is that although ISPE exists to serve the needs of the pharmaceutical community, the move towards greater outsourcing means that it is very often suppliers who are the subject matter experts with new technologies and consultants who have a broader experience in how new challenges are being tackled across the industry.
The challenge for ISPE and the GAMP Community of Practice is to get the balance right between achieving consensual good practices which regulatory agencies can buy in to and providing guidance in a timely manner. This will require more widespread use of some traditional channels such as ISPE Pharmaceutical Engineering and the greater use of Internet channels such as webcasts, web publishing and social networking. This will also mean continuing towards a model where suppliers and consultants provide valuable input but users from regulated companies are the final arbiters of what is acceptable with respect to good practice.
In some cases this will mean identifying a smaller number of thought leading subject matter experts and asking them to focus on providing pragmatic guidance in shorter timescales. This is certainly the way commercial organisations such as IVT and Concept Heidelberg are working when organizing conferences and commissioning articles and although ISPE/GAMP is a not-for-profit organisation it's important to realise that the lines between not-for-profit and commercial are indistinct in these areas. Another part of the challenge will be to identify appropriate subject matter experts in new technologies who may not be working in the pharmaceutical industry and who may not be part of the existing ISPE/GAMP community.
These challenges can however be overcome and ISPE is certainly moving towards this model, led as so often been the case by the GAMP Community of Practice.
Over the last 21 years GAMP has done an excellent job in providing practical guidance to the industry during what has certainly been the greatest period of technological change industry has seen. The fact that this has been led by volunteers (of whom both I, and Business and Decision Life Sciences are proud to be part) is perhaps one of the most amazing parts of the GAMP story. The fact that this extended community has developed good practices behind which most regulated companies and regulatory agencies now stand is a significant achievement and certainly one to be celebrated.
Happy 21st birthday GAMP - and here's to many more!
Although much of the talk was backward looking, rehashing events that led to the formation and subsequent growth of the GAMP forum, Randy Perez (current chairman of ISPE) did reflect upon the role that GAMP has played and continues to play within ISPE i.e. the GAMP Community of Practice has the best selling publications, the best attended conferences etc.
No one stopped at the time to really comment on why that might be. Having thought about it it occurs to me that this simply reflects the increasing importance of computerised systems not only in the pharmaceutical industry but also in everyday life. The pace of technology change is unending and it is perfectly understandable why GAMP came into being and why it continues to look into topical issues such as cloud computing, mobile platforms etc.
As long as this technology change continues apace GAMP will always have a role to play in applying well founded good practices to new technologies and new applications. There is however a significant challenge that ISPE/GAMP faces with the pace of technology change.
Looking back over recent years it appears that new technologies appear and are adopted by leading edge regulated companies faster than organisations such as ISPE/GAMP are currently able to respond. This is perfectly natural because the strength of organisation like ISPE and GAMP are that they are consensus driven and volunteer led. The time taken to achieve consensus and the limited time available from volunteers means that it takes months or years to discuss new technologies, the understand the implications, identify risks and how they can be mitigated and then to publish consensual good practice.
However, we're all aware that other technologies such as blogging, websites and social networking allow interaction between industry professionals in much shorter timescales. In many cases we are starting to see individuals and commercial organisations provide pragmatic and acceptable guidance well ahead of organisations such as GAMP/ISPE. The other part of the challenge is that although ISPE exists to serve the needs of the pharmaceutical community, the move towards greater outsourcing means that it is very often suppliers who are the subject matter experts with new technologies and consultants who have a broader experience in how new challenges are being tackled across the industry.
The challenge for ISPE and the GAMP Community of Practice is to get the balance right between achieving consensual good practices which regulatory agencies can buy in to and providing guidance in a timely manner. This will require more widespread use of some traditional channels such as ISPE Pharmaceutical Engineering and the greater use of Internet channels such as webcasts, web publishing and social networking. This will also mean continuing towards a model where suppliers and consultants provide valuable input but users from regulated companies are the final arbiters of what is acceptable with respect to good practice.
In some cases this will mean identifying a smaller number of thought leading subject matter experts and asking them to focus on providing pragmatic guidance in shorter timescales. This is certainly the way commercial organisations such as IVT and Concept Heidelberg are working when organizing conferences and commissioning articles and although ISPE/GAMP is a not-for-profit organisation it's important to realise that the lines between not-for-profit and commercial are indistinct in these areas. Another part of the challenge will be to identify appropriate subject matter experts in new technologies who may not be working in the pharmaceutical industry and who may not be part of the existing ISPE/GAMP community.
These challenges can however be overcome and ISPE is certainly moving towards this model, led as so often been the case by the GAMP Community of Practice.
Over the last 21 years GAMP has done an excellent job in providing practical guidance to the industry during what has certainly been the greatest period of technological change industry has seen. The fact that this has been led by volunteers (of whom both I, and Business and Decision Life Sciences are proud to be part) is perhaps one of the most amazing parts of the GAMP story. The fact that this extended community has developed good practices behind which most regulated companies and regulatory agencies now stand is a significant achievement and certainly one to be celebrated.
Happy 21st birthday GAMP - and here's to many more!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
